Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Arrival: Intellectualism is Also a Superpower

This article contains mild Arrival spoilers.
This weekend, Arrival is headed with all the weight of one of its very own egg-shaped spaceships to the Oscar stage, eager to compete for Best Picture, Best Director, and more. Like the aliens in the film itself, Denis Villeneuve’s science fiction drama is keen on delivering audiences a gift, whether Academy voters recognize it or not, which if harnessed correctly could indeed be the very “weapon” that the film’s heptapod species writes about. For Arrival, and the Ted Chiang short story that inspired it, is here to remind audiences of an increasingly forgotten fact in Western life: intelligence, expertise, and even pure intellectualism are superpowers.
Traditionally, this form of insight should be considered trivial and obvious. The sophistication of the professional class, from scientists to historians, is what has allowed society to grow and generally better itself with each passing generation. Nevertheless, the landing of Arrival is harrowingly prescient for the weekend after the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Here is a movie that celebrates the cunning and effectiveness of a few cooler heads working tirelessly toward the betterment of their planet. The ambitions of Dr. Louise Banks (Amy Adams), a professor in linguistics, Ian Donnelly (Jeremy Renner), a theoretical physicist and mathematician, and even the often skeptical Col. Weber (Forest Whitaker), a military official constantly looking for what is the best policy and not what is the best political publicity in any given situation, are depicted as admirable, beneficial, and desperately needed.
In an age where blockbusters and mainstream wide releases frequently relegate the intellectual class to being “eggheads” and “elites,” often begging to be shown up by superheroes or cars that transform into giant CGI robots, such nuance is revelatory. It is also telling that despite being a sci-fi movie with an alien invasion and several box office-friendly Oscar nominees, the brainy Arrival must be thankful it opened with $24 million this weekend. For context, that was still several spots below Doctor Strange, a movie where a surgeon ultimately saves the world by giving up medicine and using magic to punch bad guys in another dimension; that movie, which is perfectly serviceable entertainment, earned $43 million in its second weekend.
Nevertheless, intelligent science fiction over the last several years seems to be fighting back against decades of cultural disdain for “experts” and “elites,” both in fiction or otherwise. Indeed, Arrival joins a growing list of films that includes Interstellar (2014) and The Martian (2015), all of which imagine a future where the innovations of science and “big picture” thinking are celebrated instead of derided.
A lifetime ago, science fiction had its first real cinematic heyday during the 1950s and early ‘60s. While the genre was still a long way from earning the respectability and prestige that would come with Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), there were plenty of classics, and many more not-classics, being cranked out to the delight of younger audiences. In this period, the “scientist” or “expert” was often an integral part to the formula.
While hardly the most interesting character on the screen, Professor Jacob Barnhardt (Sam Jaffe) is a critical force for good in Robert Wise’s seminal 1951 effort, The Day the Earth Stood Still. Bearing more than a faint similarity to Arrival, the alien known as Klaatu (Michael Rennie) comes to Earth to deliver a message that will hopefully unite us. Upon discovering the politics of the 1950s are messier than he thought, Klaatu ends up befriending a kid named Billy (Bobby Benson), and asks the young lad who is the greatest living person on Earth. Why that’s easy, the kid already knows the brilliant Professor Barnhardt is living down the street!
And Billy should know why: he lives in an era where, for better or worse, J. Robert Oppenheimer and a collection of scientists in Los Alamos were able to develop the atomic bomb, winning World War II for the U.S. in the Pacific without having to mount a mainland invasion in Japan, as well as changing the course of history. Less monstrous, though, was that while that film was being made, Dr. Jonas Salk at the University of Pittsburgh was already on his way to developing a vaccination for polio, essentially curing a horrific virus that paralyzed children. And less than two decades after that, NASA would put a man on the moon.
Similarly, The Invasion of the Body Snatchers(1956) featured a psychiatric doctor (Kevin McCarthy) as its main character. He is one of the few sharp enough to figure out what is going on as aliens take over a small town, and much like Klaatu, he tries to shake us out of our complacency, warning us that if we don’t change our ways soon, an insidious alien invasion will create an extinction level event. Of course, we know what the chances are for humanity to start acting selflessly. Meanwhile, silly, lovable schlock like William Castle’s The Tingler (1959) even embraces the basic necessity for credible information by taking Vincent Price’s Dr. Warren Chapin at his word: in his scientific research, he has discovered a ghoulish parasite that attaches itself to humans’ spines, killing them unless they scream. And since he is an expert, you better start yelling right now, because a Tingler is loose in the movie house, so scream for your bloody life! 
Admittedly, this repeated element is a trope, a cliché from a bygone era of genre storytelling. But it is important to contrast these sentiments with modern ones, because we live in a time when scientists who work at public universities and speak about vaccines aren't considered miracle workers, but untrustworthy shills who are out to get hardworking people or the true supposed geniuses who realized after the '80s that greed is good. This mindset is demonstrated repeatedly in our entertainment ever since the years of Ronald Reagan, where heroism in Hollywood cinema became synonymous with big muscles and guns (as opposed to now, where it is big muscles and capes). Any problem could be solved with some everyday grit, and by men in wife-beaters who feel uncomfortable at a Christmas Party where they serve champagne.
Granted, I love Die Hard (1988) as much as the next guy, but like nearly all action movies of its time, the “experts” on the TV are fools droning on callously about their fancy-pants theories of Stockholm Syndrome, as oblivious to reality in the film as the FBI agents who are too deluded and arrogant to realize that Alan Rickman’s Hans Gruber isn’t a terrorist; he’s here to steal some money. They’re also smug and condescending, villainously indifferent to the life of Bruce Willis’ John McClane. The Feds don’t even care if a quarter of the hostages die, as long as they get their collar and headlines.
A decade after that, we end up with science fiction as unapologetically stupid as Armageddon (1998), a picture where nine out of every 10 NASA scientists are depicted as self-absorbed pencil-necks in need of a good wedgie; these pompous jerks can’t save the world even when they’re actually rocket scientists. Nay, leave that to all-American Bruce Willis, again in a wife-beater during his first scene, and a group of blue collar oil drillers who have as much disdain for these college-educated nerds as Michael Bay’s target audience. But don’t take my word for it; allow a stunningly candid Ben Affleck to pour gasoline on his own movie while burning the plot of Armageddon to ash in the below video.
For the record, things haven’t changed much when Michael Bay’s last blockbuster, Transformers: Age of Extinction (2014), features Mark Wahlberg as the ridiculously named Cade Yaeger, a salt of the earth Texan farmer/inventor with a Bostonian accent who saves the world alongside Optimus Prime. They're only impeded and antagonized by a pretentious snob played by Stanley Tucci, an obnoxious know-it-all whose arrogance can be pinpointed by the glasses he wears.
This is what makes films like Arrival such a breath of fresh air. As with the NASA scientists and astronauts who make up most of the core casts in both Interstellar and The Martian, Adams’ Louise is a hardworking expert whose knowledge saves lives and benefits the military, as opposed to getting in their way. As a linguistics professor, she is uniquely qualified for communicating with the aliens, and reaching a level of understanding that surpasses the classic Hollywood impulse to blow them up.

Watch The Martian on Amazon

Throughout the film, Louise and Ian are characters whose interests in language and math cross-pollinate, helping the U.S. government—as well as our allies and rivals, from the UK to China—better understand why the aliens are here. And rather than being a supporting character who masters communicating with the aliens in one scene, thereby making room for Will Smith, Tom Cruise, or Mark Wahlberg to then “save” the day while wearing a relatable baseball cap, Louise and Ian are the core of the story. Their own decades of life and learning give everyone else the chance to make informed choices, as opposed to hastily stupid ones.
Conversely, the entire modern media landscape is condemned, as cable news bemoans the fact that it’s been 48 hours, and the White House hasn’t yet explained why the aliens are here. While the talking heads wring their hands, Louise is only just reaching the space egg hovering over Montana. Subsequently, as the 24-hour news cycle spins out of control, it becomes evident that a major breakthrough on the ground is a day when we learn simply to say hello to the aliens. In contrast, media echo chambers boil over in full frenzy with nothing to talk about but speculation.
Perhaps the most damning aspect of our society in Arrival is the depiction of talk radio motor-mouths urging for war and violence without even comprehending what they are blabbing about. A Rush Limbaugh/Alex Jones type is depicted in the film as inciting vulnerable listeners to believe that the best course of action is to ignore the supposed progress of the elites, and to blow right past Louise and Ian while doing something incredibly ignorant.
If one wishes to dismiss as fantasy these parallels to the cults of personality percolating right-wing bubbles, consider that as these loud, angry, and ignorant voices—exactly like the ones in Arrival—have grown, so has a dangerous distrust of basic facts. There is now vehement hatred for who Affleck described as the “nerdo-nauts” at NASA in his own 1998 asteroid movie.

Black Sails Season 4 Episode 4

Black Sails Season 4 Episode 4
A pirate story about love. Jack loves Anne. Anne loves freedom. Eleanor loves Max (and Woodes Rogers) Max loves Silver. Silver loves Mattie. Mattie loves Silver back, which is pretty rare around here.
As we understood form previous episodes, the slave owning plantations of Nassau have split up slave families, using the threat that if one plantation faces an uprising, family members on other plantations will suffer. Because of this, the pirates, having taken the Underhill plantation, send messages that the rest of the slaves will not attempt to rise.
But, as often happened in real life, the powers that be underestimate slaves. The rest of the plantations rise. Now there is a powerful military force loose on the island. As a result, chaos reigns in Nassau town. Eleanor takes charge, but what she wants is Max. The problem is, Max is missing.
Billy has Max. Billy, by following his own plans to take the island (and doing what would have worked, had we known that the slave uprising would happen and be successful) is not currently popular with the Flint/Silver contingent. Flint tries to get the marauding pirates back under control, while Silver sets out to deal with Billy.
Meanwhile, at sea, Woodes Rogers has taken control of the Queen Anne’s Revenge. (Heaven only knows how… it seems the only men he has to sail her are Royal Marines, and it is a byword that Marines don’t know how to sail.) When he learns that Nassau is taken by the pirates, Rogers moves to send some of his Marines forward to Port Royal with his original sloop, the pirates chained in the hold. Once out of his control, however, the Marines disobey orders and set up a series of fight-to-the-death with the captive pirates.
I really would have liked to see the pirates be a little more clever here. There is only a lieutenant in charge of the Marines, and apparently, no sailors at all. Many, many times in the history of the sea, a group of captives has re-taken a ship they were confined on.
Instead, we have this series of fights. Yes, I know that the situation needs to be dire. But with the noose hanging over everyone’s head, and Port Royal so very close, the tension could have easily been ratcheted up with a good plan, a few wrong steps, and a save that allows Jack to be the clever one. No such luck.
We know (or we should know) that Anne Bonny will save the day, as soon as we see her chained up next to Jack (really would love to know where Rogers got enough chain for 42 pirates, though). The brutality, stacked on top of the brutality of the keelhauling we just witnessed, is too much.
Back in Nassau, Silver is has really grown into his position of Pirate King. But Billy wants to point something out: namely that Flint is completely crazy, and consumed by his need for a total victory in his war, and that he’ll trample or kill anyone in order to have his way. John Silver’s love, for instance.
It's amazing that Billy noticed that. It’s only what half the show (okay, maybe more than half) is about.
Deals are struck. But of course, these are pirates, and Flint is still on the loose and crazy as a rat in a tin shithouse. A deal is done to exchange Max for the pirates that Eleanor is keeping in the fort, but a subtext develops between Silver and Billy Bones.
Just to make things more complicated (always got to give the writers credit for this) Eleanor (who loves Max), is pregnant by Rogers, her husband. And they are broke. That's a great nod to history here as the historical Rogers threw away a fortune and was very broke.
Max talks to Silver, and drops a hint. Silver, of all the people on this show, is subtle and alert. And Silver, learning what she knows, sees a chance to un-crazy Flint. Silver tells Flint, and Flint speaks in platitudes. But Silver, the brains of the outfit, brings up Thomas Hamilton, the man whose death drove Flint into his destructive madness.
Is it possible that Silver can find Thomas and bring him into the fight for Nassau? And what will that do to Flint? Clean up his crazy mind? Drive him farther down the road to crazy-town? Or Break him utterly?
And what can Mattie do for the pirate cause? She is committed to Silver, but maintains loyalty to the slaves as well. Advice from that direction is common-sense. The slaves are angry at the pirates, and will treat them the same way they treat other whites. For Mattie, all they have to say is that sometimes the wise thing is to hide. After all, when you fight the world, the world fights back.
Everyone in this show has lost. Flint lost the love of his life. Blackbeard lost his life. Jack has been driven to the depths of shame and despair. Elanor has lost Max and Max has lost Elanor, and Silver, and has suffered horribly. The list goes on and on.
Eleanor is ready to quit. She offers to bargain with the pirates. Cash – the remains of the Urca gold - for the island. Rogers came to the island as much for money as for honor. Of course, Rogers is crazy now. And sailing the Queen Anne’s Revenge back to Nassau.
Everyone has lost. Can anyone win at this point? We’ll see.

Monday, February 6, 2017

Arnold Schwarzenegger on Trump: I wanted to 'smash his face'



Arnold Schwarzenegger isn’t backing down from his public feud with President Donald Trump.






The 69-year-old former California governor and current host of “The Celebrity Apprentice” responded to Trump’s tweets last month about the reality show’s low ratings.


“I said, ‘Let’s sit on it for an hour,” said Schwarzenegger to Men's Journal. “I called my assistant and said, ‘I think what we really should do is request a meeting a go back to New York. And then we just smash his face into the table.’”


“And then I think, ‘We can’t do that, either. I think I have to be above all of that and put him on the spot,’” he added.


Schwarzenegger also took to Twitter and posted a video where he challenged Trump to “work for all of the American people as aggressively as you worked for your ratings.”


“I think people really reacted well to that response,” Schwarzenegger told the magazine of his video. “I sound more presidential and more diplomatic and more elder-statesman — that’s exactly the way Donald should be.”


Last week, Trump said "The Apprentice" has been a "total disaster" since the Austrian-born took over. Trump said during the National Prayer Breakfast that we should pray for a rise in ratings.


Schwarzenegger fired back, suggesting he and Trump should switch jobs “so people can finally sleep comfortably again.”


On Friday, Trump tweeted Schwarzenegger “did a really bad job as governor of California” and “is even worse” as the host of “The Apprentice.”

Jamie Lynn Spears' daughter reportedly in critical



The 8-year-old daughter of Jamie Lynn Spears is reportedly in critical but stable condition after suffering injuries in an ATV accident in Louisiana on Sunday.


V that she was riding flipped over. The girl was airlifted to a local hospital, according to the report.


Spears was not with her daughter at the time of the accident. The girl was reportedly on a hunting trip.


A rep for Jamie Lynn's big sister, the pop star Britney Spears, told Fox News, "The details the media are reporting surrounding the incident regarding Jamie Lynn's daughter Maddie are incorrect. Right now the Spears family asks that everyone respect their privacy during this time and appreciates all the prayers and support for their family." The rep did not further eloborate which facts were incorrect.


Spears' father told ET, "All I can say is pray for our baby Maddie."


Jamie Lynn' s ep did not return Fox News' request for comment.


Spears was 16 when she announced she was pregnant. At the time she was engaged to the father Casey Aldridge, but is now married to Jamie Watson.


Fox News' Sasha Savitsky contributed to this report.

The most talked about and maybe most controversial ad in the 2017 Super Bowl lineup may have been misunderstood.



The most talked about and maybe most controversial ad in the 2017 Super Bowl lineup may have been misunderstood.


Pennsylvania-based 84 Lumber continues to draw heat over its commercial that featured a Latino mother and young daughter making the long journey from Mexico to the United States – only to be confronted by a border wall. The company, a private supplier of building materials, was being held up as a champion of lax immigration laws.


But the CEO, Maggie Hardy Magerko, is a supporter of President-elect Donald Trump and her father, who founded the company, is a former Republican politician. And that has many people now wondering what the true meaning behind the ad is.





“It was meant to call attention and to humanize this symbolic journey and show the hard work and determination that 84 Lumber has in all of their current employees, and what they’re looking for in new employees,” Hardy Magerko told the New York Times in an interview last week.


The ad has contributed to the conversation of immigration and border security, which was a focal point of Trump’s campaign and one he addressed within the first days of his presidency. But officials from the company will not say whether it took a stand one way or the other.


“The ultimate message of what we were trying to say was: this is America, the land of opportunity, and we want to make sure people see 84 Lumber as the company of opportunity,” said Steve Radick, vice president and director of public relations at Brunner, the agency that created the ad and provides support to 84 Lumber. “It was meant to be topical – it was not meant to take any political side.”


SUPER BOWL ADS GO POLITICAL, MARRING OTHERWISE CLASSIC GAME


In her interview with the Times, Hardy Magerko said she had a welcoming attitude toward certain immigrants but had faith in elected officials to “make the decisions to make us safe.”


An abbreviated version of the commercial was shown during the Super Bowl. The full ad, which apeared on the company's website, ends with the mother crying when she and her daughter reach the U.S.-Mexico border and they encounter a border wall. The daughter then pulls out a hand-made American flag, crafted with trash and materials she picked up along her journey, and the mother seems to be inspired. She sees an opening in the wall – two large wooden doors — and the two push through.


The commercial then cuts to a man driving down the highway in a pickup truck with tools and lumber in the truck bed. The commercial ends with the words “The will to succeed is always welcome here.”


It was 84 Lumber’s first Super Bowl commercial. Radick told Fox News that it has been drawing both praise and scorn, but that is the nature of good advertising.


“I think that’s what makes our country great,” Radick said.


Radick, however, said he was frustrated that his agency asked to retool the commercial because of its controversial nature. He said Fox asked for a truncated version of the ad because of its subject matter.d a very strong commercial, and any time you cannot show something that is part of your creative energy, you’re disappointed, but on a stage like the Super Bowl, the advertising has to work for the brand,” Radick said. “Ultimately, it’s Fox’s platform, it’s their decision, and we respect that.”


84 Lumber wasn’t the only Super Bowl ad with political undertones. Anheuser-Busch’s Budweiser commercial also stirred controversy for tackling immigration.


One marketing expert told Fox News that bringing politics into advertising is not the best marketing strategy.


“A good rule of thumb is to avoid political positions when promoting a brand at all costs unless your customers agree with your position,” said branding and marketing expert John Tantillo, who wrote the book “People Buy Brands, Not Companies.” “You have to attract with a message that is going to resonate with the people who buy your product –so if you get people angry about an ad, but they’re not your customers, then you don’t care about alienating people who would never buy your product to begin with.”

Miranda Kerr says she and fiance are waiting for marriage



Miranda Kerr has opened up on life with her “very traditional” partner, saying she would not have another child until the pair get married.


During an interview to promote her latest collaboration with Mother, the former Victoria’s Secret angel opened up about her relationship with Snapchat billionaire Evan Spiegel.


The 33-year-old said she would not have another child until they got married and appeared to suggest abstinence was their best form of contraception.


“Not yet. Not until after we get married. My partner is very traditional,” she told The UK Times.


“We can’t ... I mean we’re just ... waiting,” she said.


The comments mark a sharp change from her previous interviews such as with British GQ in which she spoke about using sex as exercise and joining the mile-high club.


“Let’s put it this way, I’ve had an orgasm in the air before. Alone. And together,” she said back in 2014.